DraftLC Compliance Guide — Goods Description Inconsistent with MT700 45A
Risk Metric: This discrepancy typically introduces an average $1,500–$12,000/day presentation rejection cost due to automatic rejection. The presenting bank rejects the presentation for goods description inconsistency, triggering a 5-day examination window under Article 14(a). If the beneficiary cannot provide corrected documents within the presentation deadline, the LC is partially or fully refused.
Failure Mode Analysis
The Structural Illusion
Exporters assume that "goods description is flexible" — slight variations in product names or specifications are acceptable. This is a dangerous operational hazard. Under ISBP 821 A.1, goods description inconsistency with MT700 Field 45A is an automatic discrepancy that triggers examination rejection.
The Specific Failure Mode
If the credit Field 45A specifies "HIGH-GRADE POLYPROPYLENE RESINS" and the commercial invoice shows "HIGH GRADE POLYPROPYLENE RESINS" (missing hyphen), the presentation is discrepant. The examining bank has 5 banking days under Article 14(a) to flag this. No negotiation, no exception.
Cold Verification Block
Compliance Checklist
{
"document_type": "All Documents (Commercial Invoice, Packing List, etc.)",
"required_fields": {
"goods_description": {
"required": true,
"must_match": ["credit_field_45A"],
"example": "HIGH-GRADE POLYPROPYLENE RESINS (exactly as in credit)",
"regulatory_basis": "ISBP 821 A.1"
},
"quantity": {
"required": true,
"must_match": ["credit_field_38B", "packing_list_quantity"],
"example": "10,000 KG"
},
"unit_price": {
"required": true,
"must_match": ["credit_field_44A"],
"example": "USD 10.00 PER KG"
}
},
"failure_modes": [
"Goods description differs from credit Field 45A",
"Spelling variations (e.g., missing hyphen, different capitalization)",
"Product specifications inconsistent across documents"
]
}
ASCII Compliance Flow
DOCUMENTS PREPARED
│
▼
GOODS DESC MATCH FIELD 45A?
│
YES│ NO
│ │
▼ ▼
PASS FAIL
│ │
▼ ▼
PRESENT TO BANK BANK REJECTS (Art.16)
│ │
▼ ▼
EXAMINATION 5-DAY CLOCK WORKING CAPITAL TRAPPED
│
▼
RECEIVE PAYMENT DISCREPANCY NEGOTIATION
Resolution Workflow
Step 1: Identify the Discrepancy
- Action: Compare goods description against credit Field 45A on all documents
- Regulatory basis: ISBP 821 A.1
- Timeline: Within 24 hours of presentation receipt
Step 2: Determine Root Cause
- Scenarios:
- Spelling variation (e.g., missing hyphen, different capitalization)
- Product specification changed during production
- Document prepared from different template
- Action: Compare all documents against credit Field 45A
Step 3: Request Amendment or Re-issue
- If documents are wrong: Request beneficiary re-issue documents
- If credit is wrong: Request issuing bank amend credit (Field 45A)
- Cost: $500–$2,000 amendment fee
Step 4: Re-present Documents
- Action: Submit corrected documents with exact Field 45A description
- Regulatory basis: ISBP 821 A.1
- Risk: If re-presentation exceeds presentation deadline, LC may be refused
Prevention Strategy
DraftLC Recommendation
Use DraftLC's AI copilot to pre-validate all documents before presentation. The system cross-references goods descriptions, quantities, and unit prices against the credit's Field 45A, flagging inconsistencies before they reach the bank counter.
Key Metrics to Track
- Description match rate: Target >95% of documents match Field 45A exactly
- Amendment turnaround: Target <48 hours from discrepancy identification
- Re-presentation success rate: Target >85% on first corrected submission
Generated by DraftLC Compliance Engine | UCP 600 + ISBP 821 Cross-Reference
Quick Reference Summary
- UCP 600: Article 16 — Discrepancies
- ISBP 821: Paragraph A.1
Stop Vetting Document Rules Manually
DraftLC's parser isolates every UCP 600 and ISBP 821 conflict before your documents reach the issuing bank counter — in minutes, not days.
No credit card required · Upload one Draft L/C and see conflicts flagged free