← Back to DraftLC
Trade Compliance Resolution Engine

DraftLC Compliance Guide — Goods Description Inconsistent with MT700 45A

Risk Metric: This discrepancy typically introduces an average $1,500–$12,000/day presentation rejection cost due to automatic rejection. The presenting bank rejects the presentation for goods description inconsistency, triggering a 5-day examination window under Article 14(a). If the beneficiary cannot provide corrected documents within the presentation deadline, the LC is partially or fully refused.

Failure Mode Analysis

The Structural Illusion

Exporters assume that "goods description is flexible" — slight variations in product names or specifications are acceptable. This is a dangerous operational hazard. Under ISBP 821 A.1, goods description inconsistency with MT700 Field 45A is an automatic discrepancy that triggers examination rejection.

The Specific Failure Mode

If the credit Field 45A specifies "HIGH-GRADE POLYPROPYLENE RESINS" and the commercial invoice shows "HIGH GRADE POLYPROPYLENE RESINS" (missing hyphen), the presentation is discrepant. The examining bank has 5 banking days under Article 14(a) to flag this. No negotiation, no exception.

Cold Verification Block

Compliance Checklist

{
  "document_type": "All Documents (Commercial Invoice, Packing List, etc.)",
  "required_fields": {
    "goods_description": {
      "required": true,
      "must_match": ["credit_field_45A"],
      "example": "HIGH-GRADE POLYPROPYLENE RESINS (exactly as in credit)",
      "regulatory_basis": "ISBP 821 A.1"
    },
    "quantity": {
      "required": true,
      "must_match": ["credit_field_38B", "packing_list_quantity"],
      "example": "10,000 KG"
    },
    "unit_price": {
      "required": true,
      "must_match": ["credit_field_44A"],
      "example": "USD 10.00 PER KG"
    }
  },
  "failure_modes": [
    "Goods description differs from credit Field 45A",
    "Spelling variations (e.g., missing hyphen, different capitalization)",
    "Product specifications inconsistent across documents"
  ]
}

ASCII Compliance Flow

DOCUMENTS PREPARED
    │
    ▼
GOODS DESC MATCH FIELD 45A?
    │
   YES│ NO
    │  │
    ▼  ▼
PASS  FAIL
    │  │
    ▼  ▼
PRESENT TO BANK  BANK REJECTS (Art.16)
    │                  │
    ▼                  ▼
EXAMINATION 5-DAY CLOCK  WORKING CAPITAL TRAPPED
    │
    ▼
RECEIVE PAYMENT  DISCREPANCY NEGOTIATION

Resolution Workflow

Step 1: Identify the Discrepancy

Step 2: Determine Root Cause

Step 3: Request Amendment or Re-issue

Step 4: Re-present Documents

Prevention Strategy

DraftLC Recommendation

Use DraftLC's AI copilot to pre-validate all documents before presentation. The system cross-references goods descriptions, quantities, and unit prices against the credit's Field 45A, flagging inconsistencies before they reach the bank counter.

Key Metrics to Track


Generated by DraftLC Compliance Engine | UCP 600 + ISBP 821 Cross-Reference

Quick Reference Summary

  • UCP 600: Article 16 — Discrepancies
  • ISBP 821: Paragraph A.1
DraftLC Compliance Engine

Stop Vetting Document Rules Manually

DraftLC's parser isolates every UCP 600 and ISBP 821 conflict before your documents reach the issuing bank counter — in minutes, not days.

No credit card required · Upload one Draft L/C and see conflicts flagged free